TAG / DATE
Single Post
2012, Nov 29
Ryuichi Ishikawa’s Okinawan Portraits
© Ryuichi Ishikawa

© Ryuichi Ishikawa

I first met Okinawan photographer Ryuichi Ishikawa at the 2011 Higashikawa Photo Festival 1. Many of the portfolio reviews in Higashikawa are done in a semi-public fashion, so I could watch as he filled an entire table with prints of his color portraits—while still keeping an immense stack in reserve. At the time, Ishikawa’s photographs seemed competent, and certainly showed plenty of energy, as it seemed like he’d photographed every person he’d ever come across. That actually might have been the case, because he uses a Hasselblad with a digital back (an investment which caused his reviewer a small shock).

It’s generally not that fruitful to discuss cameras up front, but in Ishikawa’s case I think it’s worth mentioning, because his newer work shows a significant improvement. On the one hand, he’s gotten better technically, avoiding the 6×6 format trap of always having the subject in the middle of the frame. More importantly, though, it seems like he’s gone a bit deeper in finding his subjects. In each case, the ability to literally shoot for free can only have helped his development. Ishikawa was awarded Honorable Mention at the 2012 Canon New Cosmos of Photography.

2

3

4

5

1
http://blog.mcvmcv.net/tag/higashikawa-photo-festival/: The equivalent of Arles in Japan, although on a much smaller scale

Tags (4)

Canon New Cosmos of Photography, Higashikawa Photo Festival, Okinawa, Ryuichi Ishikawa

This brings back memories! I was at the same table looking in amazement as he covered that table with prints. I think the new stuff here is incredible given what was shown a year ago.

It’s interesting, too, what you say about equipment: if I remember right, the two reviewers kept asking everyone what camera they shot with, and I kept wondering, “Who cares? what about the pictures?”

Funny that you were there too! I guess we met after that??

I didn’t think it was necessary to talk about the reviewers too much in the post but they were Mitsugu Ohnishi and Manabu Miyazaki. Not that I have loads of experience but Ohnishi is one of the best portfolio reviewers I have seen, he’s always positive but also offers insightful criticism. Miyazaki just looked at the photos, laughed and walked away. No animals, no interest?

Posted by Tsubasa / November 30, 2012 at 10:16 pm:

Yes, it was months later back in Tokyo when I finally bumped into you!

Hmmm, this is obviously just my impression, and my memory is also a bit hazy, but from what I remember, there was not much discussion regarding the images themselves – some suggestions here and there about where to take the projects. In any case I remember being a little disappointed. I didn’t realise Miyazaki-san reacted that way. His talk on bears in Japan was fascinating but his comments on those projects also felt a bit thin, too. Yes, perhaps he felt he couldn’t contribute if it fell out of his field? a “pro photographer” mentality?

On the other hand, I thought the group criticism going around the gallery was much more interesting and (potentially?) constructive for the people who put their works up on the wall. The central topic was the image itself, with little discussion about the equipment. Methodology yes, editing yes, choice of print size and layout yes, but camera brands/models, not so much.

Sorry to get so off topic! I just wish Ohnishi-san and Miyazaki-san made comments like yours re the digital back. Perhaps if they placed the choice and use of a digital camera within the context of the project like you did in the post, I’d have a better impression of all their reviews….Or perhaps I just totally missed them talk it….
Cheers!

Posted by seanmarclee / December 4, 2012 at 11:19 am:

this is what i wish WSJ would post for street fashion.

-->